One Hundred Weeks Interloper: Ignite Boulder

One Hundred Weeks is a column devoted to trying new things.  This was Laura’s week 7, so let’s call this week 7e, shall we?

Last night I spoke at an event called Ignite Boulder.

Ignite Boulder is a night of presentations with a twist. Presenting on a subject of their choice, speakers have exactly five minutes to teach something, enlighten us, or simply inspire—backed by twenty slides auto-advancing every fifteen seconds. Quick, fun, and smart, we sell out the largest venues in Boulder.

I applied on a whim, with a semi ridiculous topic – why waitresses are ideally suited for survival in a post-apocalyptic society.

I had intended to substitute a video of me speaking last night for my post today, but the only available video is the full 80 minute first half video.

So instead, here are some moments from the evening.

Me and my dad, pre-speech.

Me and Crockett, also pre-speech. This is when everyone kept pointing out how nervous I looked, which didn't help the nervousness level as much as you might imagine.

Star, me, and Beauty Queen. These lovely ladies dragged themselves to west Boulder from east Denver just to watch me talk. They're awesome.

And? Finally?

I made it on stage.

After that, it was smooth like buttah. I love to talk, and a captive audience is about as good as it gets.

If you were there, thank you. If you weren’t there, I’ll post a video as soon as the individual ones are available. And still thank you, for being a reader, and for putting up with my all Ignite all the time thought process lately.

We can now return to our regularly scheduled programming.

(If you’d like to see the slides I used, I’m going to have them posted on emmanation sometime today.)

Posted in Trying New Things | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Autumn

Where I live in Colorado something has changed. It started a little while ago, but now the first week of September has come home to nest. The blistering days of summer have passed- it’s even cool enough to turn off the air conditioner in the evenings. I have seen some leaves change, and I wore jeans today- the first time in nearly four months.
People around here are fond of saying they like having seasons. I think that’s just something we say because no one wants to live where the perpetual summer won’t give relief from mosquitoes and beggars.   The pressure to always have fun, always be outside, always wear sunscreen has been lifted and we’re allowed to remain indoors in front of our TVs enjoying our climate control.
I can remember winter as I sit next to the open window, bare feet, crickets chirping just outside. In winter the only place I ever feel warm is in the bathtub. I have 5 cups of hot tea a day because cold water just isn’t compelling to drink. I remember rubbing my cold feet between the sheets each night in hopes that friction alone will draw the blood down into the depths of my bed. I know all these things, but I don’t believe them. The earth outside is squishy and warm, the pavement radiating heat late into the night.
How strange this all is. I can’t help but wonder how short the distance between vacillating comfortably in our seasons and frying (or freezing) here on this planet. As it is, even our poles are uninhabitable. Would one foot or one inch closer or further from the sun matter? Would that be the difference between survival and extinction? I know I can’t take it much cooler or warmer than we experience here- that doesn’t leave much wiggle room.
But Autumn, that is a pleasant enough season. Sure it is getting continually colder, but it has some perks. I love all the fresh office supplies spilling into our lives. Even though my children don’t yet need shiny notebooks or fancy pens I always come home with something to commemorate the next year. Because, in my mind, years begin and end in autumn. Sure the official New Year is in winter, but that’s like the fiscal year circling July. The real years are marked in school time, seasonal time. We stock up on ten for a dollar corn and sweet peaches, ripe tomatoes. They are racing to ruin and we are using them to mark off our days until hibernation. No, years can’t change midseason; both our bodies and the Earth know this. I think that’s why we have such a difficult time with school starting early. For us, school began on August 16th. But summer is our reward for surviving winter, and school only reminds us we have to do it again. We need those long sultry days to burn off our fat, and our angst.
Our babies will get fat, then thin into toddlers. Our parents will be young invincible adults who mysteriously gain silver hairs and cozy love handles. As much as we would like to, we cannot lament the passage of time, even if every change resonates in us. Time is really all we have- the only thing we were entitled as a member of this life. So I suppose one has to embrace it, even if that means giving up summer.

Posted in Ramblings | 1 Comment

One Hundred Weeks: Be a Pen Pal

One Hundred Weeks is a column devoted to trying new things.  This is week seven.

A bit of housekeeping: I am moving One Hundred Weeks to Wednesdays.  I could tell you why, but then I’d die of embarrassment.  Also, I am taking suggestions for things to try.  Who knows, if I use your idea you might get something really good out of it like… uh… free publicity on a really cool blog I know about.

Back to pen-paling.  Yes, yes, I’m a 3rd grader in the body of a 30 year-old.  So what? I’ve never had a pen pal and it sounds fun.  Besides, don’t you love to get real mail?  I love to get wedding invitations in particular.  They’re beautiful- calligraphy and tissue paper, rich card stock with matching envelopes and coordinating stamps.  I wish all mail could be wedding invitations- without the obligation of attending weddings or sending gifts.   I believe that if you want to get mail you have to send it, so I have committed myself to sending it.

I took up a stationary collection.  This really helps with the mission.  Once you have cute cards in the drawer and good pens on hand you really want to write stuff.  It usually comes out like:

Dear Friend,

How are you?  I want to be your pen pal.  Isn’t that great?

Everyone is fine.  How is your gang?

Love, Laura

How do I make it like in Jane Austen novels where everyone waits anxiously for the ‘post’ and runs to the maid’s silver platter to retrieve envelopes the moment they arrive?  I imagine those letters saying all the sordid things we text about:

Then the guy at Starbucks asked me if he could whip my cream! Can you believe it?

My friends would stand at the curb, their mailboxes flopped open, tearing open my notes to see all the week’s scandal embossed on Hallmark stationary.  But it’s hard to save up our gossip in these times.  There’s a deluge of information pouring in from our CrackBerries.  So you’re off to the mall to buy running shoes?  I would probably care more if that bit were enveloped in lilac scented paper.

I don’t dislike technology.  In fact, I’m thinking about getting an iPhone (the consolation I offered myself for not getting an unneeded car).  I love being linked into all my friends and all the minutia of the day.  I just wish life had a little more climax.  I suppose it would necessarily have a little more un-climax, too.  You can’t really have something without its counterpart.  It’s the contrast that makes it noticeable.  Hm.

That’s really the problem with us, isn’t it?  We want everything to be the best.  Even laundry soap is new and improved every time you buy it.  Nobody cares about laundry soap!  I’m so desensitized to the world I can hardly feel anything anymore.  Maybe I do need a little more anti-climax, after all.  Since pen-paling is unlikely to make a comeback, I should design a whole line of electronic stationary so we can fancy-up our communication- all the way down to the tweet.  We are as addicted to our smart phones as the Austenites were to their letters.  This has potential.  If you steal my idea please send royalties to me here- in exquisite digital packaging, if you please.

Posted in Growing Up, Ramblings, Trying New Things | 1 Comment

Hi Ho Hi Ho

While you’re reading this, I’m returning to the place that I’ve spent the last two years working as a professional, adult type person – to work as an intern.

I’m interning.

At my old company.

For money, but still. COME ON. I know that I have lots of good reasons for the whole school thing. Even the waitressing thing made a lot of sense (until they fired me).

Interning at a place I was a professional?

There are pros.

  1. It’s actually pretty well paid. Compared to waiting tables or worse, working in the mall somewhere? I’m getting off well.
  2. An internship has built in school understanding. If I need finals week off, as an intern, that’s understood. If I were just a part timer, not so much.
  3. It’s 20 hours a week and I can do all but 6 of those from home. This is actually a special allowance they made for me.
  4. I know how to do the work. I will be doing a very limited subset of what I did before – I will be answering trouble tickets. Period.

Also? Cons.

  1. AN INTERN? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? I’m 29 years old. I’m already embarrassed and I haven’t even started having those hallway conversations yet. “Emma, you’re back! What are you doing here?” “Mmminterningithink.” “I’m sorry, I didn’t hear you?” “I’m interning, ok?” “….. Oh. *snort* Well. Welcome back. *chortle*”
  2. The work is boring. That’s why they hire interns to do it.
  3. I sort of thought I was done with that place. I mean, I willingly signed up for this, but when I left I had this whole ‘I’m done with you forEVER’ attitude. That was less than six weeks ago. Some forever, Emma.

Anywho. It’s going to be fine, and if it’s not, I’ll just quit again. They probably still have all my exit paperwork on file, so it’ll be easy.

Have a nice day at work, y’all.

Posted in Growing Up, Rants, Trying New Things, Work | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Underoos

I don’t think I fully understand the function of underwear.  I always thought they were to keep everything safe and secure.  They fit snugly so you are confident they’re there.  To me their purpose is much the same as a taut tucking-in at night: everything is accounted for and protected under those tight wrappings.  This can’t be it.  Have you seen underwear today?

Let us begin with men.  They have species of underwear that completely baffle me in terms of their function.  Consider the boxer short.  Sure it to protects it’s wearer from the outside world, sort of, but it doesn’t offer any sense of security.  Men are left open to drafts and (forgive me) possible exposure with that loose style.  And they’re practically made of tissue paper.  The tighty-whity is a nice choice, but must not be comfortable since so many men reject them.  My favorite men’s contender is the boxer brief.  It offers full coverage, thick fabric and a snug fit (plus, men are undeniably hot in them).  Doesn’t that seem nice, form and function?  I’m going to ignore altogether the possibility of a men’s thong.  It’s nonsensical and must exist only on TV.  So where does that leave us?  One out of four, it seems.  Really?

Women’s aren’t any better.  What could we possibly want in a pair of underwear?  It can’t be coverage.  It can’t be comfort.  Quite possibly the only thing we ask of our undergarments is sex appeal.  Does this make sense?  We have to wear them constantly, and sex only comes up every few days.  Add to that the reality that your partner only sees the panty for about 5 minutes before they’re discarded, and you have a week’s worth of wedgie for five minutes of gratification.  And don’t think that if you wear granny-panties you’re exempt from this lapse in logic.  They don’t seem to make anything without lace (uncomfortable), satin (slippery) or silk (not much in terms of protection).

Let me just address the most egregious of cases: the lace-trimmed silk thong.  I own one, you probably do too.   It doesn’t keep me inside.  It doesn’t keep the world out.  It isn’t “invisible”.  It isn’t comfortable.  In short, it isn’t anything but expensive eye candy.  Do I care how I look under my clothes?  Nope.  Could I slip it on if I think someone might see it, say, 25 seconds ahead of time? Yep.  But is this how we function?  No, we acquire a taste for it.  Let’s think about that concept: acquiring a taste.  By definition that is when you don’t like something and train yourself to deal with it.  Coffee and beer offer benefits, I have yet to find a compelling reason to wear a thong regularly.

I know what you’re thinking: she’s married.  So clearly married.  That’s true, but I wasn’t always, and I didn’t wear thongs then, either.  You know who does wear thongs?  Teenagers.  That really rubs me the wrong way.  How are we supposed to tell our youth to not have sex, or at least, to have a high self image when we buy them underwear that claims they’re nothing more than a nice piece of ass?  Imagine my dismay when I saw a middle aged man I respected folding his daughter’s thongs one laundry day.  What was he thinking?  Nothing appropriate comes to mind.  Nothing.  Any way you slice it her sexuality was being handled by her father.  Ugh.

I’m not a prude by any stretch.  Maybe it’s the feminist in me, but I think that women should wear personal garments that please them- not ones that please partners at their expense.  There is a long list of non-undergarment related items that fall into this category, too: pantyhose, high heels and make-up to name a few.  Wouldn’t it be great if we could all wear little girl panties?  They’re comfy, frilly, have cute sayings and fun art.  They also have generous cuts and adorable proportions.  You do what you want, but I’ll be playing matchy-match with my kiddos.  I’m sure my husband won’t even notice- he’ll be too relieved folding his little girls’ full coverage bikinis to care.

Posted in Body, Feminism, Growing Up, Parenting, Sex | 2 Comments

One Hundred Weeks: Read a Classic

I’m a snobby reader.  I’m actually the worst kind of snobby reader- the one who’ll only give a book thirty pages before dumping it forever.  I almost abandoned “Outlander” this way.  I see now how hasty I’d been, but don’t think it’ll change anything for me.  I absolutely can’t stand reading something that I don’t like.  There are so many books in the world.  According to the first random website I consulted there are over seven million books in print.  Since I get only 70 or 80 years on this planet I think I’d better be choosy, don’t you?

It would be nice, however, to have read some classics.  Notice I used the past tense.  Like Mark Twain says: “A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read.”  But this project is about trying new things so I thought it would be a good opportunity to check some of those babies off my list.  I selected “The Art of War,” by Sun Tsu.  You always see intellectuals in movies using pearls of wisdom they’ve retrieved from this book to save the day.  I like philosophy, might as well.

Do you know what happens when I get 30 pages into a book I can’t stand?  I throw it.  On the ground, at wall, whatever it takes.  While I’m in the confessional let me just say that I hate buying books, also.  Oh I love books.  I love their covers and their creamy pages.  I love their witty titles and the tiny photographs of their authors.  So why don’t I buy books?  Why do I throw them?  Because, 1) I don’t need to own every book I love- that would take up too much space; 2) The library will let me read them for free; and 3) Well, there really is no justification for throwing books.  I’ll stop.  I promise.  That still makes for quite an irony of an aspiring writer.  But I believe in Karma, so I’m sure I’ll get mine.

Back to “The Art of War”- four pages in I realize I cannot read this.  For god’s sakes he’s telling me that to wage a war you need to be aware of the terrain.  I hate the topic of war, and I hate long winded explanations of obvious things.  So I chuck it… I mean, laid it gently on the table and walked away. Forever.

So now I need to find another thin classic to read.  I already have Strunk and White’s “The Elements of Style” on the tower next to my bed.  It is a classic and it is thin (geez, I only have one week minus an hour to read the thing).  I know what you’re thinking: Can one really claim a writing manual as a classic?  I’m saying yes.  It’s been around for at least half a century, and this is my project.  Besides, it’s one of the books I’ve always wanted to read.  So I read it.

Do you know what lies at the end of a rainbow?  A pot full of Lucky Charms, of course, it’s right there on the box.  But do you know what is at the bottom of that little black cauldron full of cereal, the prize at the bottom of the box, as it were?  “The Elements of Style.”  No joke.  That mighty little digest is just about the best thing I’ve come across.  It’s like I had my own hallelujah chorus singing to me every time I opened it.  I’d eek back the cover and out it would come: “haaaalleluujah..”

What can I say?  I love grammar, and I love this book.  The best part was finding a worn, garage sale copy already on my shelf (the one I’d read was from the library).  It wasn’t the newest edition, but it is still excellent.  Oh, and that Mark Twain quote, it was used as an example in the book; it’s like we were meant to be.

Posted in Trying New Things | 1 Comment

Learning is FUNdamental

Yesterday was my first day of graduate school. On emmanation I mulled over the very important question of what to wear and made some assumptions regarding how many women would be in my classes.
I was both right and wrong.

I have three classes, and in each I counted the number of students of each gender.

3 women. 36 men.

3 women. 13 men.

5 women. 24 men.

Clearly, the whole ’30% women’ thing that the school’s graduate department claims is bunk. Or those women are all …. elsewhere. Majoring in geological engineering, perhaps.

I’m certainly not the first person to wonder this, but…. where the hell are all the women? No, seriously. Where? If women aren’t studying science and engineering, what are they studying? Women now represent more than half of all college students (57% as of 2005 with no indications it’s dropped since). Just to make sure this wasn’t my school and my experience, I checked in with SWE to find any nationwide information.

Number of Engineering Degrees Awarded

So my experience is apparently not misleading. Women are not going into these fields in anywhere near the numbers that men are.

Why? I don’t know the answer, because I am one of the women who chose differently. Is it that it’s not interesting? I have a hard time believing that a penis makes you want to understand computers, so my inclination is to believe that it has something to do with our expectations of women. I can tell you that I get more kudos for my choices than most men do – but wouldn’t you think that would encourage women to join these fields?

Why did or didn’t you, dear female readers, go into a science or engineering field?

Posted in Education, Feminism, Tech | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Death to Chivalry

Do you know what I love about Edward Cullen?  He’s chivalrous.  He wants to protect Bella at all costs; he wants to buy her things, open doors for her, treat her like a lady.  Somehow Ms. Meyer has managed to write him so that he’s old-fashioned in ideal, but modern in practice.  Wonderful.

My husband argues there is no place for chivalry in our time.  No place?  Dang, I got on the wrong train.  Too bad he’s right.  If you think about it, feminism doesn’t really allow for chivalry.  Why should men do more for women then women do for men?  Let’s not be confused, there is always room for courtesy.  Everyone should be polite, but it has to be reciprocal.  That’s what we’ve been fighting for, ladies.

Here’s how to tell: if you would do it for a friend then a man should do it for you.  But you should also do it for him. Would you hold the door for a friend?  Of course.  Then men should hold doors for women.  Heck, I’d hold the door for a stranger, so there really isn’t any excuse for a guy not to get it.  Still, there isn’t any excuse for me to not get it for him, either.  Should we throw up our hands and each get it for ourselves? Maybe.  Or maybe the first person to the door should always get it.

Now I’ve had a vision of myself running around the car to open the door for my husband.  This is certainly not going to happen, but there goes my dream of him dashing out in the rain to get my car door.  He does offer to pump the gas if we’re both in the car.  It’s sweet, but not chivalry- just quid pro quo.  He need only give me a look and I assume the job of dirty-diaper-disengager, even if it is his turn.

Before we begin our lament of chivalry’s demise, let’s consider if we really need it.  In my understanding, it came about because women couldn’t (weren’t allowed and weren’t capable) of taking care of themselves.  Men had to watch out for their well-being because they were, frankly, but a piece of property that required protection.  Such gestures as standing when women arrived at the table and pulling out chairs were part of the social order.  These things were common in that time just as tipping your hat to other men was.  The ‘everyday’ chivalries were a matter of good manners, just as they should be now.  The heroics were probably self-preservation.  For example, let’s say the woman you’d like to be your wife was in danger.  You could a) save her, b) let someone else save her, or c) let her perish.  In all but ‘a’ you have lost a potential wife.  That may be a problem, it may not.  My guess is that if the woman in question was wealthy or attractive ‘a’ would take the day.  Otherwise, well, too bad for her.

See, it wasn’t ever really about us women.  I think it was always about men: Men trying to show their status through their manners, or men trying to claim us like the biggest Cornish hen at the dinner table.  Why we’d swoon (then or now) really throws our logic into question.  My guess is that women like Jane Austen didn’t.  She had her novels to write, and though her men were chivalrous, they were certainly men first.  I love Darcy as much as the next girl, but honestly, he was a jerk much of the time.  When he finally throws poor Lizzy a bone she snatches it up, because let’s be fair, that was the best kind of man she could hope for.  He did love her, but was hopelessly unable to communicate.  Good luck, Lizzy, when it’s his turn to feed the dog.

Still, part of me will always wish for a true version of chivalry- the kind of thing women believe of the institution: that men have nothing better to do than worship women.  Of course we want men to serve us. I’m sure they want that from us, too.  For this reason the Edward Cullens and the Pussy Galores of fiction will always exist.  I don’t think either sex is willing to worship at the altar of the other.  That’s fine, I suppose.  Just don’t forget your manners, any of you.

Posted in Feminism, Love, Ramblings | Leave a comment

The Butcher Knife Analogy

You know how sometimes you do something and even while you’re doing it you know it’s a really bad idea, but even though you know that you do it anyway?

For example, I’m currently eating at my desk, which is up a flight of stairs from my kitchen. I needed a knife but the ones that worked with my meal were all in the dishwasher, so I grabbed a butcher knife.

This? This is the kind of thing that makes Crockett wince. I carried the knife up a flight of stairs, which is risky for someone with my level of coordination, and put it on my desk and I KNOW that this is a poor plan. I know that having this knife balanced on a plate three inches from my unpredictable elbow is a risk to my thighs, knees, toes, and worst of all? Puppies! Is a risk. If something went wrong, I would always wonder why I took the risk. The same applies to wearing my headphones while driving (something else that Crockett has specifically requested that I stop doing). The same applies to not wearing my seatbelt, and drinking more than two glasses of wine while we’re out on the town, and consuming a quantity of Splenda that requires shopping at Costco.

And yet? I do those things anyway.

Here’s the thing. I want to move in with Crockett. I love him and he loves me and we’ve been together for an appropriate amount of time both from a societal perspective and my own personal judgement. It would allow us to have a level of financial freedom that we don’t currently have. We’d see each other more often and simultaneously have to commit less time to each other. And? He’s not ready.

I know that he’s not ready, and I appreciate his reasons and I know that when he is ready it will carry more weight than if he had acquiesced the first time I brought it up. I know that it’s something I’ve done before and something that he hasn’t and that there is no good way to convince him that for me, he is different. He, for me, is the end of the line, but the fact that I have lived with several men and write about dating every musician in town and have had enough serious relationships that he can’t always keep them straight? That doesn’t help convince him. I’m not sure, truly, that those things affect him, but I’m not sure they don’t. He considers things before he does them, and I do them and then consider the effects.

I know all of this.

Still? I bring it up. More often than is necessarily useful for us. Letting it go would be dishonest to myself, but the frequency with which I mention it is the relationship equivalent of using a butcher knife when a regular knife will be available if I can just give the dishwasher a few minutes to finish it’s cycle.

I hope he knows that I know all this.

And I hope he knows that sometimes? I just can’t help myself.

I am not the only person who does things when they know better, am I?

Posted in Love, Ramblings, Trying New Things | Tagged | 3 Comments

She Said / She Said: 20-Somethings

From time to time we’ll each tackle a topic that has dominated the news (or heck, that we just find interesting). We may agree, we may not. We make no promises of catfights, but if one does occur, we’ll take pictures.

The Emergence of the 20-Something

By Emma

We’ve based this blog on the idea of being a 20 something, or growing out of that same state. We’re certainly not the first people to come up with this idea, but the whole idea here is that we have no desire to be the first at anything – we’re searching for us, and if us ends up being something that was done before then so be it.

The New York Times published an article this last weekend called, with great originality, What Is It About 20-Somethings? The premise is this: one psychologist – Jeffrey Jensen Arnett - is proposing that this time, our 20s (or very early 30s, where Miss Laura is), is actually a stage of development that we’ve previously been unaware of. He refers to us as ‘emerging adults’. It’s not that ridiculous, really - adolescence wasn’t recognized until 100 years ago. In the 1800s, 14 year olds were considered adults. That sounds straight up motherfucking insane to me. Have you met a fourteen year old lately? Those kids are not grown up by any measurement except possibly the desire to have sex, which in and of itself is not an acceptable milestone. My dogs also want to have sex, and they have missing uteruses (uteri?) and don’t even really know what sex is – they just know they like to hump. Like, perhaps, 14 year olds.

If Mr. Arnett is correct, someone in a few generations will feel similarly about me.

Here’s the thing.

Sociologists traditionally define the “transition to adulthood” as marked by five milestones: completing school, leaving home, becoming financially independent, marrying and having a child.

If those are the milestones, then I’m not technically an adult. Sure, I completed school, but I’m restarting it in two short days. I left home, but I did move back for a few months before I bought my current townhouse. Financially independent? Do we mean from my parents, or from banks and credit card companies? If it’s the latter, can I get a resounding ‘ha’? Let’s not even address the last two. I’m in a committed adult relationship, sure, but even if it progresses in a traditional manner I won’t be married until I’m in my early thirties.

So. I’m torn. On one hand, I’m pissed off that this dude is telling me that my accomplishments aren’t enough to qualify me for adult status. On the other hand?

DURING THE PERIOD he calls emerging adulthood, Arnett says that young men and women are more self-focused than at any other time of life, less certain about the future and yet also more optimistic, no matter what their economic background. This is where the “sense of possibilities” comes in, he says; they have not yet tempered their idealistic visions of what awaits. “The dreary, dead-end jobs, the bitter divorces, the disappointing and disrespectful children . . . none of them imagine that this is what the future holds for them,” he wrote.

Um. Yes. A thousand times yes.

He suggests many possibilities. Maybe we provide more services like the Peace Corps and Teach America, in order to give our emerging adults time to grow into adulthood while contributing to society. Maybe places like Yellowbrick*, a residential psychiatric treatment facility just for emerging adults, will become more popular. I recovered from an eating disorder, and I can tell you that trying to find a therapist that specialized in my disorder without primarily being dedicated to 16 year olds was brutal.

Maybe we just acknowledge, as a society, that we don’t have this shit all figured out.

My take is this: yes. We, the 20-somethings of America, are unique. Whether we’re unique compared to people of the same age in previous generations or just to people in their teens and thirties, I can’t say for sure. What I do know is that we are figuring this shit out. Sure, it’s taking us longer than it used to take people, but who is to say that’s a bad thing? Our life expectancy is now in the 90s – there is certainly no hurry. Laura Ingalls Wilder started teaching at 15 and got married at 17.  Would she have made the same decision if she’d known she had 75 more years to live?

P.S. How great is Yellowbrick as a name for a psychiatric facility? I would go there just for that. Of course, I’ve always suffered from Dorothy fantasies. Hell, maybe they could help with that.

P. P. S. One of my favorite linguistic/feminist factoids is that a group of aboriginals have foregone gender as a dividing line. Instead of saying ‘books are female, cars are male’, (I’m pointing at you, romance languages), they created four categories of nouns. One of those categories is ‘women, fire, and dangerous things’.

Arnett … describes himself as a late bloomer, a onetime emerging adult before anyone had given it a name. After graduating from Michigan State University in 1980, he spent two years playing guitar in bars and restaurants and experimented with girlfriends, drugs and general recklessness before going for his doctorate in developmental psychology at the University of Virginia.

Again? Ha.

Emerging Adulthood

By Laura

“Emerging Adulthood” is the name some psychologists give to the period of our twenties where we really don’t know what the hell is going on.  Is this a real stage of development or just another way young Trustifarians milk Mom and Dad so they can continue binge drinking and self-actualizing away the day?

I vote: real stage.  I’ve been a grown-up since I was twelve.  I’m sure my parents would disagree to some extent, but in many ways this isn’t far from the truth.  I’ve always been responsible (the white sheep in a flock of black, maybe), and I’ve met many of the “milestones of adulthood” earlier than many of my peers.  I was married at 24 and had two children by 29.  We’ve owned a house since we were married as well as cars, and had completely paid for our respective educations by the time we graduated college.

In trying to become a grown up my biggest problem was career.  Many twenty-somethings may struggle with the whole gamut (relationships, responsibility, travel, drugs), but for me it was only vocation.  It took until I recently turned 30 to realize just how much I struggled in my twenties.  In the few months since my birthday I have definitely turned a corner.  The burden of having so many choices, and worse, of making sure I pick the right one has lifted.  I have not invested the last seven years of my life in starting a career as my husband has.  I am beginning the long journey of becoming a writer well past a reasonable entry point.  Still, it doesn’t bother me the way it would have six months ago.  I’m not counting down to the next decade, hoping I have myself figured out by some arbitrary endpoint.  I have the rest of my life to start this new thing, and maybe this time it will take.

Part of the problem of being in your twenties is a combination of the expectations thrust upon us as children, and the luxury of near limitlessness in our options.  Like most little girls I was told that I could “be anything I wanted.”  Girls, though, have the added pressure of feminism working against them.  Sure we can be whatever we want, be it rocket scientist or CEO, just don’t choose homemaker or mother.  Those aren’t the things they meant.  It’s like we owe it to all the women who didn’t have our freedoms to choose extravagantly.  God help you if you can’t decide what to do for a living and find yourself at home with a kid and pregnant before you’re 30.  That looks really bad, in terms of everyone’s expectations for you.  Add to this a stellar college GPA and an “Outstanding Graduate” award and you’ve dug yourself a ditch you may never emerge from.

As long as you’re in your twenties you still have time to fix things.  The deal isn’t sealed until you hit 30.  By then you’re supposed to be old enough to know better than to switch jobs, leave your fiancé, uproot your life for the Peace Corps. For me it’s been established that I’m never going to be America’s youngest Nobel Prize winner. The lack of choices is so refreshing, as is the lack of pressure.  For once I feel like I have the freedom to really try things without everyone looking over my shoulder with high hopes and expectations.  I can mess up, since I’ll be the only one paying attention.  And maybe that alone will be enough this time.

Posted in Feminism, Growing Up, She said/She said | Tagged , , | 3 Comments